Flying coffins?
PAF aircrafts
‘widow-makers or flying coffins’?
It escapes
comprehension why, after a C-130 aircraft crashed, no other C-130 is available
in the Philippine Air Force to carry out various operational commitments. It shall take a few more weeks before the
next C-130 would be flight-ready, undergoing as it does, an
uncharacteristically long period of repair. Does it really take almost a year to repair a C-130? Does the PAF have to ‘cannibalize’ from three
other C-130s given the alleged prohibitive costs of repair or more so of having
to acquire a new one that costs $80 million? Would the defense secretary be right in claiming that there are no
available funds intended for the repair of any or all of the five C-130s in its
air base?
Lt. Gen.
Pedrito Cadungog of the Air Force was heard to have challenged to a fist fight
anyone who can tell him straight to his face that the aircrafts at the PAF
arsenal are “widow-makers or flying coffins”. Fact is, he calls those who say this as – ‘brainless, heartless, ruthless, and reckless’. Bottomline, the AFP does not have to acquire
aircrafts or naval vessels that are already considered military surplus of
another country since logically they are more expensive to maintain than brand
new airplanes. And if there is such
a word as depreciation, x number of
hours of flying and x period of time of use will naturally not give higher
guarantees of safety. So can the good
general really blame those who think that not too few instances of crashes of
PAF aircrafts can readily lead one to think that the aircrafts of the PAF have
become less reliable?
The lesson
of this C-130 crash is the expressed resolve that the government would then
insure acquiring brand new aircrafts for the Philippine Air Force no matter the
cost. Likewise, the government should
realize by now that over the long term, it could have been more expensive to
have maintained old-aged aircrafts. Certainly, it is sound military norm that any branch of the AFP should acquire
only brand new aircrafts, vessels, vehicles, armory, firearms, ordnance and
materiel – not those that are merely handed down by a military power such as
the US
RP has
probably trained the best pilots in the world. We are probably the only army who cannibalize from other aircrafts to
fly one or two of its kind given a viciously chronic claim of budgetary
constraints. So perhaps, not just for the
C-130s, the Air Force does cannibalize from the other types of planes in use –
helicopters, tora-toras, fighting jets, whatever. And when it does so, does it not become close
to possibility that our planes are reduced to become unreliable aircrafts? The same is true with the Philippine Navy
which still uses very old naval vessels from the US
There ought
to be an expressed state policy that from hereon – with the fatal crash of that
C-130 – AFP will only acquire brand new aircrafts and vessels, nothing
less. A package of reforms for the Air
Force as it is with the Navy shall now be initiated. Let us cease to be the junkyard of US
It pains us
to think that in the past, RP has shown itself too interested to acquire a
fleet of probably over-used, second-hand M151 Kennedy jeeps for use in the Army,
Air Force, Navy, Marines. Truth is,
their engines have to be replaced with locally available Toyota
By its own
official admission, PAF authorities say that aircrafts retire after x number of
flying hours. So for us to continue to
fly 40-year old vintage aircrafts must come with certain valid suspicion as to
its worthiness and integrity. There is
no doubt that C-130s in particular, have served the public very well because it
is through these cargo planes that goods, medicines are being transported from
one point to another; that troops or people are transported due to wars,
disasters, emergencies; and whose availability are ready upon the request of
our politicians regardless if such request carries with it any related value
for the military.
So the next
time the PAF flies the C-130 or any other such aircraft for that matter, it
shall be a brand new one – not “widow makers or flying coffins” – as some
quarters tend to rather believe. With no
one having to call the aircrafts of the PAF flying coffins, no one has to
engage the good general into a fist fight. What is disturbing a bit is the room for abuse in the way C-130s are
being scheduled for political reasons when they should be used for purely
military purposes. They should be made
less accessible for use of congressmen, senators, and other cabinet officials
as they tend to interfere with the true mission of the AFP in general. Truly, it costs so much in taxpayers’ money
to have to ferry a congressman or senator from one province to another – free
of charge.

Recent Comments